So, I have to admit, I’m sad the race for ISO expansion has so far only gone up. Sure, now my camera can see better in the dark than I can, but it’s only solution for the day is faster shutter speeds. Like, the best of the Olympus digital cameras (which is, of course, were my expertise lies) go up to 1/8000 second shutter, which is very groovy. Especially for stopping time. I think you can freeze a bullet at that shutter.
Where this sucks is: what if I don’t want to freeze time? What if it’s dead noon and I want to shoot a fountain and have it come out as the smooth, sensuous blurs of motion and not the dizzying, distracting matrix of time-frozen droplets?
If I had ISO 50, or ISO 25, this would be easier. Turn the gain down on the sensor and it needs to have more light hit it for a proper exposure. That also increases shutter time, which would give me flowing water. It all makes so much sense!
Until such time as I get expanded ISOs down in the double digits and not quadruple and quintuple digits, it’s a good thing people still make neutral density filters. Me, I’m looking at a good, wholesome ND8 (for a full three more stops slower on the exposure end).
Contractually, I now have to say “Olympus lens filter Indianapolis”, which is a bit awkward, but if you do happen to need a filter for an Olympus lens whilst in Indiapolis, it couldn’t be truer.



Switch To Mobile Site